Tonight on SPIKE

Posted August 11, 2008 | 12 comments

Movies & TV

The Top 10 Stars Who Have Overstayed Their Welcome

image

It feels like there’s always a small number of stars who we’re constantly hearing and reading about, and who consistently – possibly deliberately – choose the worst projects to be a part of. These are the stars who are occupying the Friend On the Couch status in popular culture, the people who were once well liked neighbors but have since become the friends who needed a place to crash and never left. They have overstayed their welcome in the public spotlight and we are sick and tired of hearing about them, and we would like them to please disappear so we can have newer, more talented stars take up our televisions and movie screens. Whether it’s because they’ve become too crazy to deal with, too prolific in an obnoxiously ubiquitous way, or simply because they never had talent to begin with and have taken the wave of good looks and good luck as far as it goes, we want these people out of our faces. Post haste.

10. Jennifer Aniston

Friends With Money - Trailer

0 Comments | 88,528 Views

Aniston has had a really good run and should be proud of what she’s accomplished (Friends, a couple of decent movies). But she has gone from being an object of our pity full of potential to an object of our scorn and a close-to-middle-aged case of Hollywood sloppy seconds. Who will Aniston shack up with next and fail to be rescued by from her decade-long case of ennui? Who cares? Last I checked – and it was a while ago – Aniston’s current beau was John Mayer. I’ll bet fifty bucks that Mayer got drunk at a club and thought he was hooking up with Matthew McConaughey, only to be rudely awoken the next morning. Look at me, I’m as bad as the worst of the gossipers. The fact of the matter is, she’s in all the tabloids every week with some new douche bag sitting by the side of a pool working on her perfect tan, the only thing in life she’s managed to perfect. Please, let’s find some other used-up has-been to waste our lives obsessing over.

9. Owen Wilson

You, Me and Dupree - Interview With Owen Wilson

0 Comments | 3,091 Views

At one time a man who was both a hero of the indie Wes Anderson ensemble and a refreshing addition to the frat pack mainstream comedies, he has played the same note on the same fiddle for a little too long. Owen Wilson has the acting range of Vince Vaughn and half his charisma. He has coasted for 12 years off a strange, endearing personality, broken-nosed American good looks, and a fortunate friendship with Wes Anderson. I think it’s safe to say at this point, however, that Wilson cannot float a film on his own and has become a vacuous addition to every movie he appears in. For his own mental well being and ours, he should sit out the next ten idiotic projects that come his way.

8. Jake Gyllenhaal

Jarhead - Interview with Jake Gyllenhaal

0 Comments | 31,963 Views

As far as I’m concerned, after Donnie Darko and Bubble Boy I haven’t seen a single film where Jake Gyllenhaal didn’t annoy the crap out of me. He has gotten a long ways off his boyish good looks and Hollywood’s mysterious indulgence of his inability to do anything other than have onscreen baby tantrums that endear him to audiences for all of fifteen minutes. Between him and his turtle-faced sister a percentage of screen time wholly out of proportion to the talent wielded by both Gyllenhaals must come to an end. But I digress; let’s try and focus just on Jake, the weaker of the two Gyllenhaals. Despite the fact that Hollywood has tried to force his transition from giddy man-child to grown up down our throats it has not stuck. In fact, it has made us hate him even more. Please give this man (child) what he truly needs: a show to host on the Disney channel.

7. Johnny Depp

Charlie and the Chocolate Factory - Interview with Johnny Depp

0 Comments | 27,982 Views

Were he to follow these basic strictures I fully believe Johnny Depp’s career would become even more successful than it is now: Johnny must never take another part where an elaborate period or fantasy costume is required; he must never take another part that requires him to paint his face white; he must never work with Tim Burton in any capacity, ever again. The 90’s have come to an end, dude, and so has Burton’s talent. Move on.

6. Cameron Diaz

Shrek The Third - Interview With Cameron Diaz

0 Comments | 2,969 Views

There’s really not that much to say about her. Diaz has taken crappy role after crappy role in lame movie after lame movie, and she puts less effort into each successive movie than she did the last. Her looks have more than faded (I’m often reminded of a smiling baseball mitt every time she bares her teeth in that cartoony grimace) though her acting ability has not grown in proportion to her lengthening teeth and withering uterus.  I think she should star in a sequel to The Mask, and rather than spend a trillion dollars on CG effects, every time the main character puts the mask on they could just have Diaz do those scenes. Which reminds me of another actor who’s welcome wore thin about as soon as he was let through the door….

5. Matthew McConaughey

Dazed and Confused about Matthew McConaughey

0 Comments | 234 Views

I’ll be the first to admit it: at this point hating on McConaughey is so easy as to be kind of facile and trite. Saying McConaughey sucks is like saying Bush is doing a bad job – duh. It’s like saying shit stinks. But I would be more than a little bit remiss were I to leave this uber no-talent-ass-clown off the list. Here’s a guy whose most admired performance was seen in a film titled Dazed and Confused, where he played a sleazy townie preying on high school girls. Here’s a guy who can get under most red-blooded Americans’ skin simply by speaking. Here’s a guy whose list of Special Skills on his resume probably included Mouth Breathing and Dimples. One of McConaughey’s most recent triumphs of cinema was titled Fools Gold. I think that title is symbolic of so much of what is wrong with McConaughey .

4. Scarlett Johansson

Lost In Translation

0 Comments | 189,840 Views

Johansson is a relative newcomer to stardom, and yet has already used up so much of the public’s good will as to give me pause. She’s given some good performances, but it seems like the more fame she accrues the stupider parts she takes and the worse her performances become. She’s a mediocre actress with a very limited range to begin with, and is most in her element when she’s able to snidely condescend to everyone onscreen in precocious bouts of well-scripted cleverness. Which gives us all of two movies: Ghost World and Lost in Translation. She’s also not too bad as the object of lust, which she’s done well in any number of films; most notably in Match Point. But when it comes to period pieces (The Other Boelyn Girl – gack! cough! wretch!) or action films (The Island) or serious drama (The Black Dahlia, The Prestige, Girl with a Pearl Earring) her gravelly voice and bee-stung lips just aren’t enough to compensate for her lack of acting talent. Enroll in an acting conservatory, Scarlett, and come back when you’re…27.

3. Will Ferrell

Spill Crew Movie Review - Will Ferrell discusses Semi-Pro with Spill.com

1 Comments | 1,273 Views

Will Ferrell has been indulged for the better part of this decade and, because of his occasional hits, has deserved his golden status. But I think we’ve gotten to the point where he’s oversaturated the market with one or two too many Ferrell films. For every great film he’s done this decade (Zoolander, Old School) he’s matched with at least a couple duds (Elf, Bewitched, Stranger Than Fiction, Blades of Glory, Semi-Pro). And now, most recently, Step Brothers, which I haven’t seen but is getting knocked by critics. At a certain point he needs to take stock in himself and ponder just how long he can pull off the bewildered innocence peppered with bouts of offensive hostility act. His abilities as a character actor are clearly strong (Anchorman; his parodies of James Lipton and George Bush), yet he is consistently cast as the goofy leading man. I.e., as himself. It’s time for Ferrell to put as much effort into his feature films as he does his viral videos.

2. Nicolas Cage

The Weather Man - Slapped With Gloves

0 Comments | 2,710 Views

Cage was soooo close to taking the top spot on this list. His offenses and injuries to cinema are grievous and many. For starters: The Weather Man, both National Treasure movies, Ghost Rider, Lord of War, 8MM, Snake Eyes, It Could Happen to You, to name just a few. And then, of course, there’s the upcoming (and nonsensically titled) Bangkok Dangerous. Cage seems to take any part that comes his way as long as it requires: obnoxiously introspective voice over; a hairpiece that resembles the leftovers of Ringo Starr’s last haircut; and a pseudo-edgy character flaw: he cares, but he’s an assassin; he’s a disrespected weatherman, but he carries a bow and arrow; he’s just a businessman—who sells weapons to third world dictators. Time for Cage to go back to his roots: Raising Arizona, Valley Girl, Leaving Las Vegas. He does best when he’s not killing people (unless Sean Connery is involved) and he’s playing some kind of doofus who’s not respected by his peers (Adaptation, Raising Arizona). Is there anything left of the Cage from the 80’s? Probably not. That doesn’t mean he can’t start doing a little damage control and simply go against his instincts: the next ten films he’s offered he should turn down, for a change.

1. Tom Cruise

Cruise Scientology Video

0 Comments | 185 Views

Of course Tom Cruise is numero uno on this list. For starters, he’s one of the biggest, if not the biggest, movie stars in the world. On top of that, he just happens to be the most famous and most evangelistic of all the Scientologists. For the past couple years he’s let his hair down and shown us just how crazy he really is. From jumping on couches on national tv, to starring in recruiting videos for the Scientologists, to shacking up with Katie Holmes and imprisoning her and their new kid, to sacrificing babies to the spirit of Ron Hubbard. This guy’s mental problems have not dissipated with age, they have grown, and his career seems to be headed the same way as his unstable head. Things started to go down hill with Vanilla Sky, improved a tiny bit with Minority Report, improved a bit more for The Last Samurai and Collateral, then took a nose dive with War of the Worlds, Mission: Impossible III and weren’t improved by Lions for Lambs. The rumor is that he’s taken a self-effacing role in Tropic Thunder, where I hear he plays a bald, braying producer, which would be a nice change of pace from the wee yet fierce hero he plays in…well, just about every movie he’s ever done. But he’s balanced out the awesomeness of his role in Tropic Thunder with a role – the lead, I believe – in Valkyrie, where he plays a Nazi who’s trying to overthrow Hitler during WWII. Who, if the trailers are any sign of things to come, doesn’t have a German accent. Tom can do his own stunts, he can charge 15 to 20 million a movie, and he can get crazy with the best of them. But accents? Tom doesn’t do accents. Tom doesn’t do much of anything anyone’s interested in. Not anymore.

Comments (12)
  • tlc1145's Profile
    0 Vote UpVote Down

    1. tlc1145 Posted on Aug 12 '08 at 11:48 AM

    You're an idiot. I won't even indulge any of your fantasies here. Jake Gyllenhaal???...Johnny Depp???....Scarlett Johansson???....Will Ferrell???...Nicolas Cage??? Are your choices for over used actors? When the likes of Shia LaBeouf, Jet Li, Brendan Fraser and Eddie Murphy are out there. Four 'actors' that are taking any pay check that comes their way. Taking as in stealing it because none of them can act. Hell two of them are in the same bloated piece of crap out right now. And I haven't even mentioned Kevin Costner....please let Bull Durham fade into memory for the master work that it is. You don't have to recreate the same character in every freaking movie that you are in....

    0 replies Reply Flag comment as inappropriate

    This comment has been buried by our users. Reveal Comment

  • nathanbloch
    0 Vote UpVote Down

    2. nathanbloch Posted on Aug 12 '08 at 1:32 PM

    Yes, my choices are for overused actors. Nicolas Cage takes any and every project that comes his way, provided the paycheck is big enough. Shia LaBeouf hasn't been alive long enough to get under our collective skini, no one takes Brendan Fraser seriously as a "movie star" (including himself, looking at his resume), and Jet Li? Not sure where you came up with that one.

    0 replies Reply Flag comment as inappropriate

    This comment has been buried by our users. Reveal Comment

  • tlc1145's Profile
    -1 Vote UpVote Down

    3. tlc1145 Posted on Aug 13 '08 at 2:03 AM

    Shia LaBeouf, for only being around for a couple of years has already done 34 movies in ten freaking years! That is over 3 a year. Damn! Jet Li??? Has 1/2 the range of Jackie Chan [which is sad] and none of his comedic skills. I just wish some new martial arts star would come along so not every role drops to this guy. I am glad Brendan Fraser doesn't consider himself a movie star....no one should.

    At least Nicolas Cage gives you bang for the buck.

    0 replies Reply Flag comment as inappropriate

    This comment has been buried by our users. Reveal Comment

  • nathanbloch
    -2 Vote UpVote Down

    4. nathanbloch Posted on Aug 13 '08 at 5:07 PM

    But no one ever heard of LaBeouf until "Disturbia"-- he wasn't playing leading men when he was 13. And the bang Cage gives me for my buck I could do without; I think that's the problem, between "National Treasure" and "Bangkok Dangerous" he's giving us too much bang. But I agree that leaving Brendan Fraser off the list was stupid. There's one NTAC who needs his comeuppance.

    0 replies Reply Flag comment as inappropriate

    This comment has been buried by our users. Reveal Comment

  • spmiracle0902
    -1 Vote UpVote Down

    5. spmiracle0902 Posted on Aug 13 '08 at 10:27 PM

    I agree with Jet Li, Eddie Murphy and maybe even Brendan Frasier...but Shia Lebouf? Please...first he has hasn't played enough lead characters to be annoying, secondly he has been terrific in every flick I have seen him in, which has admittedly only been a few...but he's a terrific actor. Thirdly, your mention of Costner is just ridiculous, who is truly one of the greatest actors of our time. Harrison Ford deserves to be on this list more than Costner, and I love Harrison Ford. Have you seen "Open Range" or "Mr. Brooks", both of which are recent, great movies? Hardly, "recreating the same character in every freaking movie you are in"...just an idiotic statement. And did you just put Nicolas Cage and "Bang for the buck" in the same sentance? His action movies are thoughtless, his "intelligent" movies are boring, and quite frankly I get more bang for the buck watching Spongebob. I agree with pretty much everyone on this list, except maybe Scarlett Johansson, who is just too hot to be on it...

    0 replies Reply Flag comment as inappropriate

    This comment has been buried by our users. Reveal Comment

  • tlc1145's Profile
    +1 Vote UpVote Down

    6. tlc1145 Posted on Aug 15 '08 at 10:09 AM

    You lost all credibility at, "Thirdly, your mention of Costner is just ridiculous, who is truly one of the greatest actors of our time" Sorry, playing the same character [even if it is his role from Bull Durham] over and over and over and over again doesn't make him anywhere in the same league with the likes of Tom Hanks, Russell Crowe, Kevin Spacey, Christian Bale, and Gary Oldman [in no particular order].

    Hell, Costner isn't even in the Top 20. He is a one note hack that got lucky with this happy go lucky real guy type role and owns it. He is terrible in anything else he tries [cough]Waterworld[/cough] [Damn, how do you mess up a movie with Dennis Hopper having that much fun?]

    Also, I am not putting Shia really on there for is past work, but the fact that there is barely a movie coming out in the next 3 years this punk isn't in. Oh and Disturbia sucked. His first true role was 'Holes' and so far his best acting. So that is 5 years. 20 roles in 5 years. Damn. gods, I cannot believe they are lining him up to be the next 'Indiana Jones'.

    0 replies Reply Flag comment as inappropriate

    This comment has been buried by our users. Reveal Comment

  • tlc1145's Profile
    -1 Vote UpVote Down

    7. tlc1145 Posted on Aug 15 '08 at 10:16 AM

    oh and on a side note:
    Mr Brooks - Any of the other 20 actors ahead of him could have done that role and better.
    Open Range - Robert Duvall carried him...and would have been a better Mr Brooks

    0 replies Reply Flag comment as inappropriate

    This comment has been buried by our users. Reveal Comment

  • spmiracle0902
    0 Vote UpVote Down

    8. spmiracle0902 Posted on Aug 15 '08 at 6:47 PM

    I have no idea where you get the idea that Costner plays the same character over and over again...you just make no sense...Kevin Spacey? Please...Christian "I only have one facial expression" Bale? (Why do you think he does so well in the Batman mask?) What the hell has he done? Name one widely regarded film? Robert Duvall carried him? Mr. Brooks...there aren't even 10 actors I'd consider ahead of him...



    Costner has had some flops (Waterworld, The Postman) because he dares to try and make movies no one else would risk making...but he has also made some of the greatest movies of our time...anyone trying to deny that is an idiot. You must be one of those people that rave about an actor because he "tries something different" even though the movie is as boring as hell...or care more about an actor's "performance" than how good the movie he performs in actually is...Holleywood is suppose to be about making great & entertaining movies...this is something Costner continually has shown the ability to do...regardless of what you think about his acting...ummm...."ability"...how about this? Name any one of your other "20" so called actors who starred in, directed and produced a film (Dances with Wolves) which was nominated for 12 academy awards and won seven? That answer would be "0".

    0 replies Reply Flag comment as inappropriate

    This comment has been buried by our users. Reveal Comment

  • tlc1145's Profile
    0 Vote UpVote Down

    9. tlc1145 Posted on Aug 16 '08 at 8:44 AM

    Dances with Wolves: Won 7 Oscars. Another 30 wins & 20 nominations

    http://www.imdb.com/title/tt0099348/awards

    And none of those wins were for Best Acting! Good movie, but he still didn't act in it well. His nomination for Best Actor was a combo of average performances that year and the synergy of having a top film. So, do you actually get chicks being a Costner groupie? Christian Bale out acted Costner at the age of 13! Ever seen Empire of the Sun? How about American Psycho? Equilibrium? Machinist? The Prestige? That is called acting. Why don't you actually go out and watch a movie that didn't make $100M.

    Oh, and I am not even going to address your comment about Kevin Spacey. That just doubles your ignorance.

    0 replies Reply Flag comment as inappropriate

    This comment has been buried by our users. Reveal Comment

  • spmiracle0902
    0 Vote UpVote Down

    10. spmiracle0902 Posted on Aug 20 '08 at 9:26 PM

    Did Costner sleep with your boyfriend or something? All you did was just verify my previous statement, you care more about an actor's so called "ability" than the quality of the movie he plays in...that's fine that's your choice...holleywood has a million boring movies with "quality acting" for you to enjoy. The rest of us "simpletons" actually want something entertaining out of a movie. I would agree that a big-budget doesn't automatically make a movie worth watching either. I have seen some big-budget movies that were good, and some low-budget movies that were just as good if not better. I however think among the attributes an actor would need to be considered talented would be the ability to choose and make a movie people actually want to see. Apparently not in your case...again that's fine that's your choice...I am going to make this my last comment because you are obviously nothing but a gross waste of time, but in response to your comment "Why don't you actually go out and watch a movie that didn't make $100M." I won't waste anytime arguing the validity of that statement, but if it was valid, I would say that's because most movies that don't make any money generally SUCK. Go get a life loser...

    0 replies Reply Flag comment as inappropriate

    This comment has been buried by our users. Reveal Comment

  • mufleh63's Profile
    0 Vote UpVote Down

    11. mufleh63 Posted on Feb 1 '09 at 9:44 PM

    they will be down sooner or later

    0 replies Reply Flag comment as inappropriate

    This comment has been buried by our users. Reveal Comment

  • ClitCommander's Profile
    0 Vote UpVote Down

    12. ClitCommander Posted on May 4 '09 at 9:21 AM

    I always like reading your lists, but it always erks me that you have to throw in some political stab, keep politics out of ur blogs man, I dont care that you dont like Bush, or should say Didnt, now... its just annoying to me that every list has some cheap stab, by you, and multiple other bloggers on here. If I discussed politics in any seminar or meeting in my career, Id probably lose a lot of bisuness, cuz no one gives a shit about your 2 cents.

    0 replies Reply Flag comment as inappropriate

    This comment has been buried by our users. Reveal Comment

Saving your comment...

Loading...
Leave a Comment

You must Log-in to leave a comment

You are commenting on: The Top 10 Stars Who Have Overstayed Their Welcome

Flag this Content as Inappropriate

Disclaimer

The opinions expressed on this blog are the personal opinions of our bloggers and in no way reflect the opinions of SPIKE, MTV Networks or Viacom.

Warning

Some blogs or websites linked from this site may contain objectionable content. SPIKE is not affiliated with these websites and makes no representations or warranties as to their content.

Likes: 2  

Views: 3,479

Extras

  1. » Ever seen SFW Porn? Now you have! Check out Sasha Grey, Aria Giovanni and more in hilarious episodes of PG Porn.
  2. » Bachelors, do you need simple-to-make recipes? Check out the FOOD DUDE for easy-to-make killer recipes: Food Dude.

» SPIKE.com at a glance

Login

X

Forgot your username or password?

Sign-up


Privacy Policy and Terms of Use

close menu

Copy & paste this code into your blog, MySpace, Friendster or anywhere else you can add HTML.

close form

I would like to flag this content as inappropriate.

close form

I would like to flag this comment as inappropriate.