9:00am
World's Wildest Police Videos: High Speed Chases
10:30am
The Fast and the Furious (2001): Fast and the Furious, The (2001)
1:00pm
2 Fast 2 Furious (2003)
3:30pm
The Fast and The Furious: Tokyo Drift (2006): Fast and the Furious, The: Tokyo Drift (2006)
6:00pm
Fast Five (2011)
9:00pm
Lip Sync Battle: Jimmy Fallon vs. Dwayne Johnson
9:30pm
Lip Sync Battle: TMI: Andy Cohen vs. Willie Geist
10:00pm
Lip Sync Battle: Jay Leno vs. Craig Ferguson
11:33pm
2 Fast 2 Furious (2003)
2:03am
Walking Tall (2004)
9:00am
Gangland: The Assassins
10:00am
Gangland: Shoot to Kill
11:00am
Gangland: Dog Fights
12:00pm
Gangland: Biker Wars 2
1:00pm
Gangland: Lords of the Holy City
2:00pm
Gangsters: America’s Most Evil : Alejandro Corredor

Emily Wants to be a Real Girl

by Reverend_Danger   August 20, 2008 at 2:13PM  |  Views: 186

And she almost is. The guys that did the animation for GTA are pushing digital animation to a new, less cop-killing level with Emily.  She's a damn-near photorealistic creation that, they say, heralds a new era in film and gaming in which the lines between reality and unreality will be blurred.  Sound confusing? Hit the jump for the eerie, eerie details.

The technology is based on dozens and dozens of tiny calculations based on the human face.  The detail* they go into is staggering.  These calculations are possible because of a new chip, the Radeon HD 4870 X2, which can compute 2.4 teraflops per second.  Numbers are boring, though, what about the art of it?  Timesonline reports:

"Ninety per cent of the work is convincing people that the eyes are real," Mike Starkenburg, chief operating officer of Image Metrics, said.

"The subtlety of the timing of eye movements is a big one. People also have a natural asymmetry - for instance, in the muscles in the side of their face. Those types of imperfections aren't that significant but they are what makes people look real."  

The article goes on to say that practical applications of this technology to games and movies are a ways off (they estimate 2020), so don't get too excited for a real-live robotic Lara Croft just yet.  Until then, though, here's Emily: 

*Call me conservative, but putting an actor inside a giant metallic orb and firing 3,000 lights at him sounds needlessly more complicated than pointing one movie camera at him.  It also sounds less creepy.  Like, way less creepy.

 

THE DAILY FOUR